About a week ago, hubby and I were talking about how suggestion changed our opinions on certain foods. Because someone or something effected a food item, we no longer want or have the desire to eat whatever it is. I told him that I l
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb410/fb4103cf62deba574bcb8483977c5eb07c32865f" alt=""
Once I got it, I realized I was holding a Richard Bachm.an book in my hand rather than a Ste.phen King (yes, I know. It's the same person). I'd forgotten he used a psuedo-name for a bit. Why would someone as talented and popular as he is use a false name? Of course, it wasn't long before people figured out who it was but, still. I think if I wrote as a profession and had that kind of celebrity, I'd never hide my writing. It's not like people are mobbing him at grocery stores. He can still have a pretty regular life.
Whatever his reason for it, the proof is certainly in the pudding. His writing style is like no other and I am quickly remembering why I was such a big fan in the first place. Perhaps the latest novel will adorn my nightstand after this one.
3 comments:
yikes!
I had to leave Stephen King behind. I used to love all that scary stuff when I was in school too but I don't have the stomach for it like you do.
PS
I think the pseudonym was because he was writing potboilers. . . lot of folks do that.
Oh, that makes sense. Potboilers! Gotta pay the car note, right?
Post a Comment